![]() Where this is the case, the old glass box with the key in it is generally discouraged, even where the door is for use by a small number of staff. The operation of the fastenings should be “readily apparent without the use of a key and without having to manipulate more than one mechanism.”Īlthough it’s preferable not to fit any secondary locking devices to fire exits, it’s accepted that security needs may make it a necessity. It states that in general, doors on escape routes shouldn’t be fitted with locks, latches, or bolts unless these are simple fastening, which can readily be operated. Locking devicesīS9999:2008, “Code of practice for fire safety in the design, management and use of buildings,” gives further advice on the subject of locking. One approved for single door application might not work effectively on double doors, so it’s important that the one used is suitable for the circumstances. These may be selected for doors to be used by staff, the benefit being that along with higher operating forces, there is the opportunity for higher security levels.īoth BS EN 1125 and BS EN 179 include specific tests depending on whether the device is intended for single or double door use. there needs to be a deliberate action, not just pressure against the device. These “emergency exit devices” conform to BS EN 179 instead, and are generally not suitable as more force is needed to operate them, i.e. There’s an alternative type of a smaller push pad or lever, which seems to be mistakenly put onto doors for use by the public. The relevant standard is BS EN 1125 - “Panic exit devices operated by a horizontal bar”. These fittings are long horizontal bars or pads which operate by body pressure. If there are more than 60 persons likely to use an exit, and that group includes those unfamiliar with the building, a degree of panic must be assumed. In buildings used by the general public, the usual hardware on final exits is a horizontal push pad or bar, unless the door is completely free-moving, such as the front door (once unlocked).įor this category of occupant, doors need to be operated easily and obviously. Turn knob, single bolt, or other simply operated, single device.Emergency exit devices (the smaller pads and levers).Security fittings on fire doors should be thought of as a hierarchy: Official guidance to the RRO (from the Communities and Local Government department) recommends that that all doors on escape routes should open in the direction of escape, but states that this is particularly important if more than 60 people use them or they provide an exit from a high fire risk area. The need for outward opening fire exit doors ![]() ![]() The RRO only applies to England and Wales, although other regions of the UK have different legislation with a similar outcome. In the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 (RRO)*, article 14 covers “Emergency Routes and Exits,” and states that, “In the event of danger, it must be possible for persons to evacuate the premises as quickly and safely as possible”.ĭepending on circumstances, this normally involves emergency doors opening in the direction of escape, no sliding or revolving doors used as emergency exits, and emergency doors not being locked or fastened in a manner that they cannot be easily and immediately opened. What can you have, where, and who says so?įurther reading: How Many Fire Exits Are Required in a Building? and as you may suspect, there are hidden rules about it. After all, there are quite a few different options - push pads, glass bolts, turn knobs, etc. ![]() Are you wondering what hardware you should fit to your emergency fire exit doors?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |